home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mips.pfalz.de!not-for-mail
- From: naddy@mips.pfalz.de (Christian Weisgerber)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: faster than 28.8
- Date: 4 Mar 1996 13:15:28 +0100
- Message-ID: <4hemt0$tnh@mips.pfalz.de>
- References: <sumner-2001961038000001@sumner.tiac.net> <4ds0fp$4ap4@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <AD29910A96685C7229@asd-stat13-153.dial.xs4all.nl> <bgrubb-2301960739100001@10.0.2.15> <4e3lbi$r3m@brachio.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE> <eric-2601960120540001@sobt.accessorl.n <4g720r$1ahs@navajo.gate.net> <m0tpDtE-000Cn0C@mips.pfalz.de> <Pine.A32.3.91.960222022217.52122E@navajo.gate.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: mips.pfalz.de
-
- doug haire <dhaire@gate.net> writes:
-
- > > for (i = 0; i < 256; i++)
- > > for (j = 0; j < 256; j++) {
- > > putchar(i);
- > > putchar(j);
- > > }
- >
- > I'll try that. Looks like an interesting thing to do. Why does that
- > adversely affect (assuming adverse because of "killer" term) V.42bis?
-
- Unfortunately my understanding of LZW isn't as good as it ought to be.
- I'd have to trace the steps a LZW compressor does when fed with this
- data and so far I've been to lazy.
-
- In practice this input seems to eat a lot of CPU, some (sending) modems
- slow down, some slow down a lot. Comparing different models of the
- Courier and ZyXEL 1496 lines indicates that those modems with faster
- CPUs do better.
-
- --
- Christian 'naddy' Weisgerber naddy@mips.pfalz.de
- See another pointless homepage at <URL:http://home.pages.de/~naddy/>.
-